M. Bertimon
To Win
C. Tabur
To Win
Maxence Bertimon vs Liam Branger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L W L L
Form
W W W W L W L W W LH2H: Bertimon 1 - 0 Branger
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bertimon winning 2 and Branger winning 1. The last match between Bertimon and Branger was at the M25 Nevers, 03-10-2024, Second, I.hard with Maxence Bertimon getting the victory 6-7(7) 7-6(14) 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Maxence Bertimon | 1 |
| Liam Branger | 0 |
M25 Nevers(03-10-2024)
6
7
7
6
6
0
| Bertimon | Stats | Branger |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (8-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (2-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 809 | Ranking | N/A |
| 786 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 25 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (91-75) | Career Total W/L | 55% (24-20) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 7-6(14) 6-0 |
Stats 
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Liam Branger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
117)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 3:0:0 | Average Match Time | 3:0:0 |
| 63% (65/104) | 1st Serve % | 51% (60/117) |
| 72% (47/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (41/60) |
| 59% (23/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 41% (48/117) | Return Points Win % | 33% (34/104) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maxence Bertimon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Raquillet
Player
Maxence Bertimon
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naoya Honda
Player
Maxence Bertimon
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
11 of
18)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
18
Total Points Won
16
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Francesco Ferrari
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Branko Djuric
Player
Maxence Bertimon
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
11
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Florian Broska
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
17 of
20)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
11 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
28
Total Points Won
34
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Menelaos Efstathiou
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Eleftherios Neos
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Maxence Bertimon
67%
(
72 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
3
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Maxence Bertimon
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Raphael Vaksmann
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Branger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Taisei Ichikawa
Player
Liam Branger
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
9
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Adam Taylor
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Liam Branger
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Felix Einig
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
14
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Liam Branger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
51%
(
60 of
117)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
9
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
117)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(7) 7-6(14) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Daniil Glinka
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Benjamin Vitter
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (91/75) | Win/Loss | 55% (24/20) |
| 56% (208/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (56/42) |
| 53% (1873/1643) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (509/445) |
| 54% (25/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) |
| 60% (47/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (11/10) |
| 45% (19/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 361 | Aces Total | 161 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 271 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1:13:7 | Average Match Time | 1:16:34 |
| 362.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 123.66 |
| 62% (5000/8070) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1357/2165) |
| 68% (3380/5000) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (935/1357) |
| 48% (1485/3070) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (399/808) |
| 43% (362/851) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (101/211) |
| 41% (3330/8110) | Return Points Win % | 41% (881/2128) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 55% (91/75) | Futures W/L | 54% (22/19) |
| 55% (91/164) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (24/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (21/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 42% (19/45) | Deciding Set Win % | 20% (2/10) |
| 90% (88/79) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (28/23) |
| 10% (88/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (28/5) |
| 16% (77/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (16/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
